Friday, December 2, 2016

Second chance law second chance (D week)

The Article I chose talks about the  Second chance law for young criminals. hundreds of criminals are sentenced by D.C Judges under an obscure local law craft to give second chances to young adult offenders have gone on to rob, rape, or kill residents of national capital. This law's main purpose of the law is for the sole purpose of  this law is rehabilitation. through my eyes I see this as an opportunity to get these young convicts back on the streets and to help better them while they are still young. I'm sure the people of D.C thought the same like the article says "the youth rehabilitation act is to allow for shorter sentences for some criminals and opportunity for offenders to emerge with no criminal record" however a Washington investigator have found a pattern of offenders returning to there criminal ways. I could see the problem here people who fight to put these criminals away don't want them on the streets again and don't care for who is being locked away for the rest of their life.  but my thoughts are to offer more help to prevent this from happening again. a good solution  could be to put these ex criminals through programs that could keep them off the streets and help to repair their life and keep them from resorting back to a life of crime. to make sure of this they should only help criminals with petty crimes which doesn't lead to murder. i feel like this law should be tweaked and used in many different states. i also strongly believe this law should be of aid to criminals who had to plead guilty for a crime they did not commit to get a shorter sentence.  What do you think is the right way to rehabilitate a young criminal? do you think criminals should be rehabilitated? Should future jobs who are looking to hire employees should ask if they were criminals? what about Government jobs should they hire ex criminals?  Link

8 comments:

  1. i believe it was for young criminals 22 years and below.
    no the ex criminals who have committed a petty crime should be offered this kind of help. i don't believe this could really help a murder unless hes is a first time offender.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe people should be able to have jobs and return to society after prison. The justice system unfairly targets people of color and list harmless drugs like marijuana as title one drugs. It's not fair for people to pay their debt to society and not be able to get jobs or get disenfranchised. These obstacles are the main reason why people who get out of prision will eventually go back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I absolutely agree. The justice system needs to be fixed so that criminals can turn a new leaf like Bill Clinton 3 strike law that paired with a fixed second chance law can help first time offenders so that they don't have to return to a life of crime

      Delete
  3. To answer your first question I believe the correct way to rehabilitate young people is through education and opportunity. Allow them to learn a skill so they can give back to the community while building confidence and integrating there way back into their communities. It is fair that a person with a criminal past can have their records viewed by a job but after a certain amount of time it should notatter and should not outweigh their skill or potential. As for government jobs if the crime was extremely serve then I don't believe they should be able to run for a government position but regular government jobs like in the post office should be fair game

    ReplyDelete
  4. This will not benefit people that are older than 22.. so why would we want it. Theres people in their 30's 60's in prison right now for petty crimes and crimes where they had to plea guilty when he/she wasnt , yes it seems right to get the younger ones out so we can help them and rehabilitate them so they can go back to the right path.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also believe that the government should not control if they get hired or not because they can have the "label" but who they are is very different.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I do agree this law and that it should be tweaked a little bit,but it would be hard to say right now on a decision whether they deserve to be hired by government jobs. We would have to see how these programs of keeping them out of trouble would be of good effects.

    ReplyDelete